Statement:
Because of the two major universities in Cambridge, Harvard and MIT, the
city has available the means to the knowledge and expertise to do what is
in the best interests of the environment, at multiple levels. The question
comes down to whether there is the will and
what can be done at both the municipal level as well as the
responsibility of the individual.
My
philosophy is that we must respect the planet and that begins with recycling at
home.
As
for City Goverment, there are standards and
measurements for buildings, construction and open space which must be
implemented by the City Agencies which oversee ordinances and zoning
guidelines.
There
is much work that needs to be done in order to educate the public and
developers, regarding the impact of not abiding
by what is in place, at the municipal level for environmental protection
for the citizens of Cambridge. We must learn to live
within our ecological limits and strive to build on what we know is
environmentally sound policy.
Laurie Taymorberry
1-yes
2-no(I do not support tax breaks for doing what is in the best
interest of the public good.)
3-yes
4-yes
5-yes(The Alewife area in N. Cambridge is a flood plain. The edge
where Rt. 2 comes in gets flooded quite
frequently. Allowing the use of flood plains for building of middle
income housing would
result in undesirable housing which would bring about
slum housing with high rents.
6-No(We do not need to add to the bureacracy.)
7-Yes
8-No(There is a need for shelters to protect residents from
the rain; a need for bathroom facilities,
snack bars for children, etc.)
9-yes
10-yes
11-yes
12-yes
13-yes
14-yes
15-no( I do not believe in the mandatory purchase of T-passes
for residential parking
permits).
16-yes
17-yes
18-no(I do not support tax break incentives for corporations.)
19-yes
return to forum of
www.cambridgegreen.org
Environmental Issues: short
answer yes and no with exceptions noted. Please answer so we can compare
candidates. Fax answers to 617-876-8991 or email: carmean2@yahoo.com
1. Do you support the LEED silver standard for new
buildings?
- Do you support tax incentives for private developers
to use LEED silver standards for building and restoration?
- Would you support master planning, zoning, incentives
and requirements by the City to make shopping, laundry, schools, parks, recreation
and libraries and essential services within a ten-minute walk of
residents?
- Would you support life-cycle costing in planning so
that the cost of use, harm, waste, and renewal is included in costing for
decisions, for example leaf removal?
- Would you support conservation by-laws to restrict
building in one-hundred year flood plains?
- Should Cambridge hire an Energy Manager?
- Do you support requiring contractors to submit their
plans before paving?
- Would you support a ban on building in parks and open
space?
9.
Do you support
the current proposed tree ordinance to protect trees?
10. Would you support protection of legacy trees of more
than 30 inches diameter at breast height on private and public property? Would
you support protection of trees on lot lines, where most of our city’s trees
live?
11. Do you support incentives
to enforce the current noise ordinance? Noise level restrictions on lawn &
landscaping equipment like leaf blowers?
- Do you support more aggressive enforcement of the
state’s 5-minute anti-idling statute, especially for buses, trucks and
heavy construction vehicles and posting the anti-idling law near schools
and major intersections?
- Do you support approval of shuttles in Cambridge?
- Do you support requiring all City
funded or partially-funded vehicles use no diesel, or have 2007 standards
and requiring all the existing diesel vehicles to use low sulfur or
bio-diesel fuel and requiring all City non-emergency vehicles have 27 mpg?
- Do you favor discounts/rebates for T-passes to all
residents and do you favor mandatory T-pass purchase for each parking
permit?
- Do you support shuttle service for elders, youth and
all citizens between neighborhood centers and to the new Main Library?
- Do you support elimination of the one parking place
per unit requirement if the building is within a mile or half-mile to a T
stop?
- Do you support tax incentives to use compact
fluorescents and LEDs, bicycles, sustainable
energy sources, maintenance of large trees, reuse of older buildings,
gardens and open space and other wise environmental strategies?
- Do you support taxing vehicles by weight so that SUVs
and vehicles would have to cover the life cycle cost including reparation
of air quality and increased risk of danger to their passengers and those
they hit?